God, Hope & Helping Others
For most of My life I have sought solutions to the problems on this planet. I have studied, not the "economics" They teach in school (though, having worked 14 years in banking, I grasp all that quite well), which begins with the assumption that money is a necessary tool, but the foundational reason of why We Humans exchange to survive.
What I have discovered is that all money, at its roots, is accounting for Human energy added. In all its forms, trade, barter, work exchange, shells, beads, sticks notched and split, coins (metals), bills, and electronic bits, We are placing value on, and accounting for the Human energy added into this world of Ours.
Another aspect of money, especially the less "tangible" forms - shells, beads, sticks notched and split, coins (metals), bills, and electronic bits - is that it promotes psychopaths to the top. The power over Others that money offers draws Them, and They will do LITERALLY anything to get and keep that power over Others, while the non-psychopaths (94% of Us) will stop short of unEthical means to obtain money, except in desperation.
Accounting for Human energy made sense back when such directed, meaningful energy was scarce. Somehow Humans had to be motivated to do the necessary (and sometimes UNnecessary) things that keep Human society going, but that there were not enough People (or no One) who WANTED to do the work. Slavery came about to accomplish these things, and then wage slavery. Humanity has never had complete freedom on Our planet (stolen from Us by the psychopaths in control through "trusts" and deceit).
Today, We have game-changing technologies - and if We play Our cards right, We can co-create a vastly better way of operating Our society. A way that promotes the caring Ones to take care of things, and not the psychopaths. The three key elements are: free energy, the interweb, and robots.
I invite the reader to My forum (a free forum, all ad revenue goes to ProBoards, the host) to investigate what I suggest We choose to create:
As long as We retain the twin towers to psychopaths in power (accounting for Human energy and top-down "government" systems) and the loathsome vine that supports the towers (the legal system, which thwarts Ethics FAR more than serves them), We WILL see poverty on a rich and abundant planet, oppression of Humans, wage/debt slavery, intrusion, and profiteering (including but surely not limited to war profiteering).
Thank You for Your response - for some reason I was not notified... Anyway, I have spent 100+ hours researching the flat earth. Here are My findings:
First, the north-centric model (Dubay, et al) is flat wrong - it would have the stars in the "south" whipping by at a fair clip in nearly straight lines, with different stars seen from different southern points. But the stars in the south circle around a point (no visible star there) mirroring the behavior of those in the north, always due south from wherever One can see it (anywhere in the southern hemisphere). See: watch?v=dsz6yKDrCHM if You think those southern stars are projected into the sky.
Second, on a flat plain, when going upward, once You get above things that block the view, You would see all You can see. Going up further will show no more. But when We go upwards, We see more and more of the planet, exactly like One would going up from the surface of a ball.
Third, the flat earth "movement" is RIFE with disingenuous arguments - ignoring scale, gravity, optics, friction, refraction, AND misstating distances to "prove" flatness. WHY does the truth need even ONE disingenuous argument?
Fourth, though the flat earth proponents have said that if You get a stronger instrument, it will bring ships back into view that sank, hull to crows nest, at the horizon, I have watched ships sink with binoculars and then switched to a fairly powerful telescope - and nope. It does NOT bring them back into view. Once sunk, They cannot be seen, and so... There are People out there LYING to prove the flat earth. WHY would the truth need even ONE lie?
Fifth, the fact that, for aeons, sailors have been calculating latitude in the northern hemisphere by the position of Polaris, with a direct correlation between latitude and degrees above the horizon, proves a globe. This ONLY works on a globe. When Polaris is at the horizon (something that cannot happen on a pancake), One is at the equator (0º), when it is 45º up from the horizon, One is at the 45th parallel...
As for some of the disingenuous arguments for the pancake... I'll give You three. I have seen People pouring water on a ball to "prove" water doesn't "stick to a ball," ignoring the planet-sized gravity well immediately adjacent pulling the water OFF the ball. I have seen People spinning balls on the floor to "prove" a ball will not keep spinning, ignoring the friction of the ball on the floor. And I have seen People point to a glass of water saying, "Look! It's FLAT!" As if, at that small a fraction of a single degree of arc (4" is 0.00009% of a single degree of arc), We would see the hump in the middle a few MOLECULES high by eyeballing the glass.
So. The FE needs disingenuous arguments and lies. The globe needs NONE. Which model has the highest probability of being correct?
There are MANY free energy solutions that have been suppressed and hidden. I know personally of one: electrogravitics (EG). EG went into black projects nearly 60 years ago. So though there are scam artists out there, claiming FE, that does not mean that ALL FE technologies are scams.